Photoaging and Cosmetic Result with Artificial Daylight Photo-dynamic Therapy Using Methyl Aminolevulinate
- Acta Derm Venereol. 2025 Apr 22:105:adv43245. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v105.43245.
- 1. Knappschaft Kliniken Recklinghausen, Recklinghausen, Germany. [email protected].
- 2. Galderma Laboratorium GmbH, Düsseldorf, Germany.
- 3. Hautarztpraxis Dr. Hoffmann, Witten, Germany.
- 4. Privatpraxis Dermatologie am Luisenplatz, Potsdam, Germany.
- 5. Dermatologische Praxis Dr. med. Fränken, Schwelm, Germany.
- 6. MVZ Fokus-Haut Corius Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.
- 7. Hautarztpraxis Hautaerzte-paasch.de, Jesewitz OT Gotha, Germany.
- 8. BAG Drs. Quist, Mainz, Germany.
- 9. Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Universitätsmedizin Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
- 10. Galderma SA, Switzerland.
- 11. Hautzentrum Köln (Cologne Dermatology), Köln, Germany; Faculty of Health, University Witten-Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
Artificial daylight photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolevulinate is an effective and almost painless treatment approach for actinic keratoses. The objective of the prospective, non-interventional, multicentre study ArtLight (NCT05725213) was to gain comprehensive insights into the cosmetic effect of methyl aminolevulinate-artificial daylight photodynamic therapy in patients with actinic keratoses using different artificial daylight systems under real-world conditions. The study enrolled patients with Olsen grade 1 or 2 actinic keratoses on the face and scalp in Germany. Patients were treated with methyl aminolevulinate-artificial daylight photodynamic therapy. The cosmetic effect was assessed via photodamage parameters (global score for photoaging, mottled pigmentation, tactile roughness, telangiectasias, fine lines). Each photodamage variable was recorded on a 5-point scale (0-4). In total, 224 patients (median age: 75.0 years [range 50-91], 85.3% male, 62.5% Olsen grade 2, 55.4% treatment-naive) were treated with methyl aminolevulinate-artificial daylight photodynamic therapy. At month 3, all 5 parameters of photoaging were significantly reduced from baseline (p < 0.001). The majority of patients (81.3%) and investigators (83.6%) rated the cosmetic result as good or very good. Beyond effective eradication of actinic keratoses, field-directed methyl aminolevulinate-artificial daylight photodynamic therapy can improve photoaging symptoms, including tactile roughness, mottled pigmentation, telangiectasis, and fine lines. Thus methyl aminolevulinate-artificial daylight photodynamic therapy provides additional benefits, particularly for patients concerned with cosmetic outcomes during or after treatment.