TRK-IN-31 hydrochloride
TRK-IN-31 hydrochloride is an orally active TRK inhibitor with an IC50 of 1.8 nM. TRK-IN-31 hydrochloride has superior antiproliferative activity in the Ba/F3-MPRIP-TRKAG667C cells, and potently inhibits TRK kinase activity with high selectivity. TRK-IN-31 hydrochloride significantly inhibits tumor growth in Ba/F3-MPRIP-TRKAG667C subcutaneous tumor mice model.
For research use only. We do not sell to patients.
- Formula: C30H30ClF2N5O4
- Molecular Weight:598.04
-
Storage:
Please store the product under the recommended conditions in the Certificate of Analysis.
Biological Activity
Description
IC50 & Target
|
TRK 1.8 nM () |
In Vitro
TRK-IN-31 hydrochloride (Compound 10o•HCl) (72 h) has potent antiproliferative activity with IC50s of 81.4 and 131.4 nM for Ba/F3-MPRIP-TRKAG667C and Ba/F3-MPRIP-TRKAG595R cells, respectively[1].
TRK-IN-31 hydrochloride (1-20 nM, 2 h) notably inhibits TRK signaling in both Ba/F3-MPRIP-TRKA and MO-91 cells[1].
TRK-IN-31 hydrochloride (0.04-1 μM, 2 h) significantly inhibits cellular TRKA G667C signaling with great efficacy at 0.2 μM in Ba/F3-MPRIP-TRKAG667C cells[1].
TRK-IN-31 hydrochloride (1 μM, 1 h) has great selectivity among a panel of 92 kinases (S(10): 0.043) and significant inhibitory activities against TRKA/B/C and CSF1R with inhibition rates of 97%-103%[1].
TRK-IN-31 hydrochloride has superior binding capacity on TRKAG595R, enhances stability with protein and reduces conformational fluctuations[1].
MedChemExpress (MCE) has not independently confirmed the accuracy of these methods. They are for reference only. Further protocols information, click here.
-
Cell Line:Ba/F3-MPRIP-TRKA cells, MO-91 cells
-
Concentration:1, 5, 20 nM
-
Incubation Time:2 h
-
Result:Notably inhibited TRK signaling in both Ba/F3-MPRIP-TRKA and MO-91 cells.
Nearly abolished the activation of TRKA and its key downstream molecules PLCγ and Erk at 5 nmol/L in Ba/F3-MPRIP-TRKA cells.
Parmacokinetics
| Species | Dose | Route | Tmax | Cmax | AUC0-t | AUC0-∞ | MRT | T1/2 | F | CL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mice | 10 mg/kg | p.o. | 0.417 h | 442 ng/mL | 0.564 ng/L.h | 0.567 ng/L.h | 1.24 h | 0.903 h | 20.4 % | / |
| Mice | 5 mg/kg | i.v. | / | / | 1.386 ng/L.h | 1.389 ng/L.h | 0.413 h | 0.812 h | / | 3.625 L/h/kg |
In Vivo
MedChemExpress (MCE) has not independently confirmed the accuracy of these methods. They are for reference only.
-
Animal Model:Female nude mice (4-6 weeks old) were injected subcutaneously into the right flank with Ba/F3-MPRIP-TRKAG667C cells (2 × 106 cells/mouse)[1].
-
Dosage:25, 150 mg/kg
-
Administration:Oral gavage (p.o.), twice daily for 10 days after tumors reaching approximately 50 mm3.
-
Result:Significantly delayed tumor growth in a dose-dependent manner, with inhibition rates of 42.4% and 52.5% at 25 and 150 mg/kg, respectively.
Had good tolerance with no significant body weight loss up to 150 mg/kg.
Chemical Information
-
Molecular Weight 598.04
-
Formula C30H30ClF2N5O4
-
SMILES
FC1=CC=C(C=C1[C@@H]2N(C3=CNC(C(C(NC4=CC5=C(C=C4)OC(C(N6CCN(CC6)C)=O)=C5)=O)=C3)=O)CCC2)F.Cl
-
Shipping
Room temperature in continental US; may vary elsewhere.
-
Storage
Please store the product under the recommended conditions in the Certificate of Analysis.
Protocols
-
Kinase activity and phosphorylation assays
Kinase activity assays measure the ability of kinases to transfer phosphate groups from ATP to specific substrates, while phosphorylation assays detect the presence and levels of phosphorylated proteins. Common methods include radiolabeled ATP incorporation (e. g. ,), ADP release detection via bioluminescence (e. g. ,[3]), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for phospho-specific epitopes (e. g. ,[6]), and microtiter-based formats for high-throughput screening (e. g. ,[8]). The ADP-Glo assay quantifies kinase activity by measuring ADP produced during phosphorylation using a luciferase-based system. Radiometric assays involve autoradiography or scintillation counting after incorporation of 32P-labeled ATP into substrate proteins. ELISA-based approaches rely on phospho-specific antibodies to detect activated kinases in cell lysates or purified samples.
-
How to Select the Route of Administration for Mammals
Route-of-administration selection in mammals is a pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, formulation, animal-welfare, and translational decision, not a default technical choice. The selected route should match the study goal: intravenous dosing is most useful when complete systemic exposure and rapid onset are required, oral dosing is most translational for orally intended medicines but is affected by absorption and first-pass metabolism, subcutaneous or intramuscular dosing can provide slower systemic exposure, and intraperitoneal dosing can be useful in rodent proof-of-concept studies but may have limited clinical translation. Published route-comparison studies show that the same compound can produce different exposure, onset, bioavailability, tissue distribution, and tolerability depending on route; therefore, route choice should be supported by pilot pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic evidence when the literature is insufficient. Unresolved questions include how to standardize route sel
-
Cell Cytotoxicity Assay
Cytotoxicity assays are usually based on the assessment of cell membrane damage, which can also be indirectly detected by measuring cell viability. Detection methods include MTT assay, CKK-8 assay, LDH assay and ATP assay, etc.
-
Patient-Derived Xenograft (PDX)
Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models are generated by engrafting primary human tumor tissue directly into immunodeficient mice, allowing in vivo propagation of patient tumor biology without initial in vitro adaptation. These models are used to preserve key histopathological and molecular characteristics of the original tumor and enable assessment of tumor growth dynamics and therapeutic response in a living organism. The biological readout is tumor engraftment and subsequent growth in the murine host, which reflects the ability of human tumor cells to survive, vascularize, and expand in an immunocompromised microenvironment.
-
Patient-Derived Orthotopic Xenograft (PDOX)
Patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) modeling implants fresh patient tumor tissue or patient-derived tumor cells into the anatomically corresponding organ or tissue site of immunodeficient mice, usually by surgical orthotopic implantation, to preserve patient tumor histology, local microenvironmental context, invasion, metastatic behavior, and treatment-response features better than subcutaneous implantation. PDOX readouts include tumor engraftment, orthotopic tumor growth, local invasion, metastasis, recurrence after resection, histologic similarity to the donor tumor, biomarker retention, molecular concordance, survival, and response or resistance to therapy. PDOX models are used for preclinical drug testing and individualized therapy evaluation, but engraftment success varies by tumor type and specimen quality.
-
Protocol for Kinase activity and phosphorylation assays
Kinase activity assays measure transfer of phosphate from ATP to a protein or peptide substrate, generating phosphorylated substrate, ADP, or incorporated radiolabeled phosphate as the readout; phosphorylation assays measure site-specific phosphorylation in cells or tissues as a proxy for kinase-pathway activation, inhibition, or substrate regulation. Phosphorylation can be detected by phospho-specific Western blot, immunoprecipitation kinase assay, phospho-immunofluorescence, phospho-flow cytometry, luminescent ADP detection, radiolabeled ATP incorporation, or reporter-based pathway assays, and these readouts can be applied to cancer cells, primary neurons, mouse tumors, organoids, inflammatory macrophages, ferroptosis studies, and mitophagy studies when the kinase target is biologically relevant.
-
Subcutaneous Cell-Line-Derived Xenograft
Subcutaneous cell-line-derived xenograft (CDX) models are established by implanting cultured human cancer cell lines into immunodeficient mice, where the injected cells form localized tumors that can be monitored in vivo as a measure of tumorigenic potential, growth kinetics, and treatment response. These models are widely used in oncology research because they allow reproducible tumor formation and enable comparative assessment of tumor growth between different cell lines or genetic manipulations in a controlled in vivo microenvironment. Subcutaneous implantation of cancer cells in immunodeficient mice is a standard approach for evaluating tumor growth behavior and therapeutic response across multiple cancer types, including prostate, esophageal, pancreatic, and colon cancer models.
-
Orthotopic Cell-Line Xenograft
Orthotopic cell-line xenograft models involve implantation of human cancer cell lines into the anatomically corresponding organ of immunodeficient mice to reproduce tumor growth within a native microenvironment, enabling more clinically relevant tumor behavior compared with subcutaneous models. These models are widely used because orthotopic placement better recapitulates tumor progression, including invasion and metastatic spread, which are often underrepresented in heterotopic implantation systems. Compared with conventional xenografts, orthotopic implantation is described as more technically complex but provides improved simulation of tumor-microenvironment interactions and metastatic behavior, making it particularly valuable for translational oncology research. Surgical orthotopic implantation approaches have been emphasized as enabling faithful reproduction of clinical cancer features, including metastasis and disease progression patterns that align with the tumor’s organ of origi
-
Cell Viability Determination by MTT Colorimetric Assay
The following protocol uses the MTT colorimetric assay as a classic literature-established method for assessing cell viability/metabolic activity in cultured mammalian cells. MTT[3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] is reduced by metabolically active cells to a colored formazan product; the amount of formazan is quantified spectrophotometrically and provides an indirect measure of metabolically active viable cells. Importantly, MTT reduction reflects cellular oxidoreductase/metabolic activity rather than an absolute direct count of living cells, so changes in cellular metabolism can alter the signal independently of cell number.
Purity & Documentation
References
Calculators
Concentration (start) × Volume (start) = Concentration (final) × Volume (final)