Bond stability of conventional adhesive system with MMP inhibitors to superficial and deep dentin

  • J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019 Dec:100:103402. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103402.
Fabiana Souza Simmer  1 Eduardo Moreira da Silva  1 Rafaela da Silva Gonçalves Bezerra  1 Maria Elisa da Silva Nunes Gomes Miranda  1 Jaime Dutra Noronha Filho  1 Cristiane Mariote Amaral  2
Affiliations
  • 1. Analytical Laboratory of Restorative Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • 2. Analytical Laboratory of Restorative Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Electronic address: [email protected].
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the microshear bond strength (μSBS) to deep (DD) or superficial (SD) dentin (μSBS) overtime, nanoleakage (AG%), degree of conversion (DC%), water sorption (WSp), and solubility (WSl) of an adhesive system [Adper Single Bond 2(ASB)] containing Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMP) inhibitors [GM1489 (ASB-GM), Batimastat (ASB-BAT), or Chlorhexidine diacetate (ASB-CHX)]. ASB without inhibitor was used as control (CONTROL).

Materials and methods: WSp and WSL were calculated based on ISO4049. DC% was analyzed using FT-IR spectroscopy. Dentin discs were used for μSBS evaluation. For AG%, resin-dentin beams were analyzed under scanning electronic microscopy. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA (AG% and μSBS) or ANOVA (DC%, WSp, WSl) and Tukey's HSD test.

Results: ASB-CHX presented the lowest DC%, lowest WSp, and highest WSl. ASB-GM reached the highest immediate μSBS in SD, only different from ASB-CHX. In DD, ASB-BAT and ASB-GM had the highest μSBS, statistically different from ASB-CHX. After twelve months, ASB-GM and ASB-BAT presented higher μSBS in SD when compared to CONTROL and ASB-CHX. In DD, ASB-GM reached the highest value, which was statistically different from CONTROL and ASB-CHX. CONTROL at both dentin depths and ASB-CHX at DD did not maintain bond stability. In SD after 12 months, ASB-BAT and ASB-GM decreased AG%. In DD, only ASB-GM reduced AG%.

Conclusion: The ASB containing Batimastat and GM1489 maintained resin-dentin bond stability after 12 months for both dentin depths, without jeopardizing WSp, WSl, or DC% of the adhesive system. The ASB-GM presented greater μSBS after 12 months when compared with ASB.

Clinical significance: Batimastat and GM1489 could be suitable for inclusion as an MMP-inhibitor into Single Bond to improve the bond stability to superficial and deep dentin, without jeopardize the physic-mechanical proprieties.

Keywords
Dentin bond stability; MMP inhibitor; Microshear bond strength; Solubility; Sorption.
Products
  • Cat. No.
    Product Name
    Description
    Target
    Research Area
  • MMP Inhibitor
    target: MMP