BBI-2779
Based on 1 Customer Validation
BBI-2779 is a highly selective, orally active CHK1 inhibitor with a CHK1 IC50 of 0.3 nM. BBI-2779 leverages transcription-replication conflicts on extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) to induce synthetic lethality, replication stress, DNA damage and cell death in ecDNA-positive tumor cells. BBI-2779 blocks ecDNA-mediated acquired resistance to targeted therapies and inhibits tumor growth in mouse models of gastric cancer. BBI-2779 is applicable to ecDNA-positive cancer-related research.
For research use only. We do not sell to patients.
- Purity : 98.51%
- CAS No.: 2871057-47-3
- Formula: C19H19N7O2
- Molecular Weight:377.40
-
Storage:Powder -20°C, 3 years , 4°C, 2 years ; In solvent -80°C, 6 months , -20°C, 1 month
Biological Activity
Description
IC50 & Target
[1]|
Chk1 0.3 nM (IC50) |
In Vitro
BBI-2779 selectively eliminates ecDNA-positive tumor cells by exploiting transcription-replication conflicts to induce synthetic lethality, and blocks ecDNA-mediated acquired resistance to targeted therapies in in vitro models[1].
BBI-2779 potently and selectively inhibits CHK1 in a cell-free biochemical assay with an IC50 of 0.3 nM and 160-fold selectivity over CHK2; it inhibited CHK1 activity, with an IC50 of 3 nM in HT29 cells[2].
BBI-2779 (14-1110 nM; 16 h) induces dose-dependent replication stress, measured via phospho-RPA32 (S8) puncta, preferentially in ecDNA-positive COLO320DM colorectal cancer cells compared to chromosomal amplification-positive COLO320HSR cells after 16 hours of treatment[2].
BBI-2779 (3-12 nM; 24 h) induces dose-dependent replication stress and DNA damage, measured via pCHK1-S345, pRPA2-S8, and γH2AX expression, preferentially in ecDNA-positive COLO320DM colorectal cancer cells compared to chromosomal amplification-positive COLO320HSR cells[2].
BBI-2779 (3 days) is 10-fold more potent at inducing cytotoxicity in ecDNA-positive COLO320DM colorectal cancer cells (IC50 = 6 nM) compared to chromosomal amplification-positive COLO320HSR cells (IC50 = 60 nM)[2].
MedChemExpress (MCE) has not independently confirmed the accuracy of these methods. They are for reference only. Further protocols information, click here.
-
Cell Line:COLO320DM (ecDNA-positive colorectal cancer cells), COLO320HSR (chromosomal amplification colorectal cancer cells)
-
Concentration:14, 41, 123, 370, 1111 nM
-
Incubation Time:16 h
-
Result:Induced a dose-dependent increase in the percentage of cells with ≥3 phospho-RPA32 (S8) puncta (a replication stress biomarker).
Showed a significantly greater response in COLO320DM cells compared to COLO320HSR cells at all tested concentrations.
-
Cell Line:COLO320DM (ecDNA-positive colorectal cancer cells), COLO320HSR (chromosomal amplification colorectal cancer cells)
-
Concentration:3, 4, 6, 8, 12 nM
-
Incubation Time:24 h
-
Result:Induced a dose-dependent increase in pCHK1-S345, pRPA2-S8, and γH2AX (replication stress and DNA damage biomarkers) in COLO320DM cells.
Showed a substantially weaker response in COLO320HSR cells at equivalent concentrations.
Parmacokinetics
| Species | Dose | Route | CL | T1/2 | Tmax | Cmax | AUCinf | F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mice[2] | 30 mg/kg | p.o. | 229 mL/min/kg | 1.11 h | 0.5 h | 713 ng/mL | 1568 ng·h/mL | 72 % |
In Vivo
MedChemExpress (MCE) has not independently confirmed the accuracy of these methods. They are for reference only.
-
Animal Model:severe combined immunodeficient beige (female, 9 weeks old)[2]
-
Dosage:30 mg/kg (single-agent); 30 mg/kg (combination with infigratinib 15 mg/kg)
-
Administration:p.o.; every other day; 27 days (single-agent); p.o.; every other day; 27 days (combination with infigratinib p.o., once daily, 27 days)
-
Result:Induced 64% tumour growth inhibition compared to vehicle-treated mice.
Resulted in significant tumour regression over the study duration when combined with infigratinib.
Suppressed adaptive FGFR2 oncogene copy number amplification on ecDNA (induced by single-agent infigratinib) when combined with infigratinib.
Increased expression of replication stress biomarkers pCHK1-S345 and pRPA2-S8 in tumour tissue compared to vehicle controls when combined with infigratinib.
Chemical Information
-
CAS No. 2871057-47-3
-
Appearance Solid
-
Molecular Weight 377.40
-
Formula C19H19N7O2
-
Color White to light yellow
-
SMILES
COC1=CC=CC(O[C@H]2[C@@H](CC2)N)=C1C3=CC(NC4=NC=C(C#N)N=C4)=NN3
-
Shipping
Room temperature in continental US; may vary elsewhere.
-
Storage
Powder -20°C 3 years 4°C 2 years In solvent -80°C 6 months -20°C 1 month
Protocols
-
Cell Cytotoxicity Assay
Cytotoxicity assays are usually based on the assessment of cell membrane damage, which can also be indirectly detected by measuring cell viability. Detection methods include MTT assay, CKK-8 assay, LDH assay and ATP assay, etc.
-
Mammalian live/dead viability and cytotoxicity staining
Live/dead viability and cytotoxicity staining assays are based on the simultaneous detection of intracellular esterase activity in metabolically active (viable) cells and membrane integrity loss in non-viable cells. In commonly used dual-staining approaches, membrane-permeant fluorogenic substrates are converted by intracellular esterases into fluorescent products in live cells, while impermeant DNA-binding dyes selectively enter cells with compromised plasma membranes and label nucleic acids in dead or dying cells, enabling discrimination between viable and non-viable populations by fluorescence microscopy or flow cytometry.
-
Patient-Derived Xenograft (PDX)
Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models are generated by engrafting primary human tumor tissue directly into immunodeficient mice, allowing in vivo propagation of patient tumor biology without initial in vitro adaptation. These models are used to preserve key histopathological and molecular characteristics of the original tumor and enable assessment of tumor growth dynamics and therapeutic response in a living organism. The biological readout is tumor engraftment and subsequent growth in the murine host, which reflects the ability of human tumor cells to survive, vascularize, and expand in an immunocompromised microenvironment.
-
Apoptosis Solutions
Apoptosis is a regulated, generally non-lytic cell-death pathway that removes unwanted, damaged, infected, or abnormal cells through coordinated morphological changes, caspase activation, DNA fragmentation, and membrane remodeling. The intrinsic apoptosis pathway is controlled mainly by mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization, BCL-2 family proteins, cytochrome c release, apoptosome formation, caspase-9 activation, and downstream executioner caspase-3/7 activation. The extrinsic apoptosis pathway is initiated by death receptors such as Fas, TNFR, and TRAIL receptors, which recruit adaptor proteins and activate caspase-8 before engaging executioner caspases or mitochondrial amplification through BID cleavage. Apoptosis is linked to many phenotypes, including cancer cell killing, tissue homeostasis, immune regulation, neurodegeneration, infection response, and treatment-induced cytotoxicity; unresolved questions include how apoptosis interacts with necroptosis, pyroptosis, ferroptos
-
Patient-Derived Orthotopic Xenograft (PDOX)
Patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) modeling implants fresh patient tumor tissue or patient-derived tumor cells into the anatomically corresponding organ or tissue site of immunodeficient mice, usually by surgical orthotopic implantation, to preserve patient tumor histology, local microenvironmental context, invasion, metastatic behavior, and treatment-response features better than subcutaneous implantation. PDOX readouts include tumor engraftment, orthotopic tumor growth, local invasion, metastasis, recurrence after resection, histologic similarity to the donor tumor, biomarker retention, molecular concordance, survival, and response or resistance to therapy. PDOX models are used for preclinical drug testing and individualized therapy evaluation, but engraftment success varies by tumor type and specimen quality.
-
Subcutaneous Cell-Line-Derived Xenograft
Subcutaneous cell-line-derived xenograft (CDX) models are established by implanting cultured human cancer cell lines into immunodeficient mice, where the injected cells form localized tumors that can be monitored in vivo as a measure of tumorigenic potential, growth kinetics, and treatment response. These models are widely used in oncology research because they allow reproducible tumor formation and enable comparative assessment of tumor growth between different cell lines or genetic manipulations in a controlled in vivo microenvironment. Subcutaneous implantation of cancer cells in immunodeficient mice is a standard approach for evaluating tumor growth behavior and therapeutic response across multiple cancer types, including prostate, esophageal, pancreatic, and colon cancer models.
-
Genotoxicity/Mutagenicity Study
The bacterial reverse mutation assay detects point mutations that restore amino-acid prototrophy in auxotrophic Salmonella typhimurium or Escherichia coli tester strains; after exposure to a test article, mutagenic activity is read out as an increased number of revertant colonies on minimal agar compared with the vehicle control. The assay uses tester strains with different mutation targets so that base-substitution and frameshift mutagens can be detected, and testing is performed with and without exogenous mammalian metabolic activation because some chemicals require biotransformation to become mutagenic.
-
Orthotopic Cell-Line Xenograft
Orthotopic cell-line xenograft models involve implantation of human cancer cell lines into the anatomically corresponding organ of immunodeficient mice to reproduce tumor growth within a native microenvironment, enabling more clinically relevant tumor behavior compared with subcutaneous models. These models are widely used because orthotopic placement better recapitulates tumor progression, including invasion and metastatic spread, which are often underrepresented in heterotopic implantation systems. Compared with conventional xenografts, orthotopic implantation is described as more technically complex but provides improved simulation of tumor-microenvironment interactions and metastatic behavior, making it particularly valuable for translational oncology research. Surgical orthotopic implantation approaches have been emphasized as enabling faithful reproduction of clinical cancer features, including metastasis and disease progression patterns that align with the tumor’s organ of origi
Purity & Documentation
-
Data Sheet (298 KB)
-
SDS (252 KB)
- English - EN (252 KB)
- Français - FR (252 KB)
- Deutsch - DE (252 KB)
- Norwegian - NO (252 KB)
- Español - ES (252 KB)
- Swedish - SV (252 KB)
- Italian - IT (252 KB)
- Korean - KR (252 KB)
- Portuguese - PT (252 KB)
-
Handling Instructions (2659 KB)
References
Calculators
Concentration (start) × Volume (start) = Concentration (final) × Volume (final)