Efficacy of cefiderocol in combination with xeruborbactam versus taniborbactam against cefiderocol-resistant NDM-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa
- Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025 Nov 5;69(11):e0085725. doi: 10.1128/aac.00857-25.
- 1. Institute of Medical Microbiology, University of Lübeck and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
- 2. German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Hamburg-Lübeck-Borstel-Riems, Lübeck, Germany.
- 3. Vietnamese-German Centre for Medical Research (VG-CARE), Hanoi, Vietnam.
- 4. 108 Military Central Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
- 5. Faculty of Medicine, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, Vietnam.
- 6. Institute of Tropical Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
- 7. German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
- 8. Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
- 9. Airway Research Center North (ARCN), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Lübeck, Germany.
- 10. Department of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria.
We evaluated the in vitro activity of cefiderocol in combination with either taniborbactam or xeruborbactam against cefiderocol-resistant, blaNDM-positive Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates from Vietnam and Nigeria. Taniborbactam restored cefiderocol susceptibility in most isolates (20/21, 95.2%), while xeruborbactam had no effect. Resistance was reversed by dipicolinic acid, which confirmed New-Delhi Metallo-β-lactamase (NDM-mediated) resistance. One isolate that was unresponsive to taniborbactam carried multiple copies of blaNDM-1. These findings highlight the species-specific limitations of xeruborbactam in P. aeruginosa.
-
Cat. No.Product NameDescriptionTargetResearch Area
-