Antibacterial agent 207
Antibacterial agent 207 (Compound Ru1) has antibacterial activity against S. aureus (MIC: 1 μg/mL), and low resistance frequencies. Antibacterial agent 207 destroys the bacterial cell membrane, promote production of ROS in bacteria.
For research use only. We do not sell to patients.
- Formula: C61H56F12N8O3P2Ru
- Molecular Weight:1340.15
-
Storage:
Please store the product under the recommended conditions in the Certificate of Analysis.
Biological Activity
Description
In Vitro
Antibacterial agent 207 (1 and 2 μg/mL) shows damage on bacterial membrane of S. aureus (PI staining), and induces release of β-galactosidase[1].
Antibacterial agent 207 (1 and 2 μg/mL, 2 h) cause a range of oxidative stress damage, induces ROS in S. aureus[1].
Antibacterial agent 207 (0.25 or 0.5 μg/mL, 48 h) inhibit the secretion of α-toxin and bacterial biofilm formation in S. aureus[1].
MedChemExpress (MCE) has not independently confirmed the accuracy of these methods. They are for reference only. Further protocols information, click here.
In Vivo
Antibacterial agent 207 (100 μg/mL, applied to the wound, twice a day) has robust anti-infective efficacy against S. aureus in mice skin infected with S. aureus[1].
MedChemExpress (MCE) has not independently confirmed the accuracy of these methods. They are for reference only.
Chemical Information
-
Molecular Weight 1340.15
-
Formula C61H56F12N8O3P2Ru
-
SMILES
O=C(OCCC1(CC2C3)CC3CC(C2)C1)CCCOC(C=C4)=CC=C4C(N5C6=CC=CC=C6)=NC7=C5C8=C(C9=C7C=CC=[N]9%10)[N]([Ru+2]%11%12%10([N]%13=CC=CC=C%13C%14=[N]%12C=CC=C%14)[N]%15=C(C%16=CC=CC=[N]%16%11)C=CC=C%15)=CC=C8.[F-][P+5]([F-])([F-])([F-])([F-])[F-].[F-][P+5]([F-])([F-])([F-])([F-])[F-]
-
Shipping
Room temperature in continental US; may vary elsewhere.
-
Storage
Please store the product under the recommended conditions in the Certificate of Analysis.
Protocols
-
Research Protocol for Infectious Diseases
Infectious-disease experiments test how pathogens interact with host barriers, innate immune receptors, inflammatory signaling, pathogen replication, and tissue injury; pattern-recognition receptors such as TLRs, RIG-I-like receptors, NOD-like receptors, and inflammasomes detect microbial molecules and activate NF-κB, interferon, and cytokine responses. The central hypothesis is that infection severity reflects the balance between pathogen burden and host response: protective inflammation restricts pathogen growth, whereas excessive or mislocalized inflammation contributes to tissue damage and disease phenotype. Unresolved questions include which host pathways are protective versus pathogenic, why some infection models fail to translate to human disease, and which combined readouts best predict clinically relevant infection outcomes.
-
ROS/oxidative-stress fluorescent staining
ROS/oxidative-stress fluorescent staining uses cell-permeant fluorogenic probes that become fluorescent after oxidation inside cells or tissues; commonly used examples include DCFH-DA/DCFDA for broad cellular oxidant detection, DHE for superoxide-related signal detection, MitoSOX for mitochondrial superoxide-related signal detection, and CellROX probes for oxidative-stress-associated fluorescence readouts. The assay detects probe oxidation rather than a single ROS species unless the probe and analysis method have been chemically validated for that species. DCFH-DA enters cells, is deacetylated by intracellular esterases to DCFH, and produces fluorescent DCF after oxidation, so the readout is used as an operational measure of total cellular oxidative stress rather than a species-specific ROS measurement. DHE and MitoSOX can report superoxide-related oxidation, but red fluorescence alone can include non-specific ethidium-like oxidation products; HPLC or optimized spectral approaches are
-
Bacterial live/dead nucleic-acid viability staining
The LIVE/DEAD bacterial viability staining method is based on differential permeability of nucleic-acid-binding fluorescent dyes, most commonly SYTO 9 and propidium iodide (PI), which enables discrimination of bacterial populations with intact versus compromised cytoplasmic membranes. SYTO 9 penetrates both intact and damaged bacterial membranes and binds nucleic acids to produce green fluorescence, whereas propidium iodide penetrates only cells with compromised membranes and fluoresces red while also reducing SYTO 9 signal through competitive binding and fluorescence interactions. The resulting fluorescence pattern is interpreted as a proxy for membrane integrity, which is widely used as an indicator of bacterial viability in microscopy, flow cytometry, and spectroscopic platforms. However, mechanistic studies show that SYTO 9 and PI interactions involve displacement and fluorescence resonance energy transfer effects, which can influence signal interpretation depending on dye ratios a
Purity & Documentation
-
Data Sheet (268 KB)
-
SDS (252 KB)
- Français - FR (252 KB)
- Deutsch - DE (252 KB)
- Norwegian - NO (252 KB)
- Español - ES (252 KB)
- Swedish - SV (252 KB)
- Italian - IT (252 KB)
- Korean - KR (252 KB)
- Portuguese - PT (252 KB)
-
Handling Instructions (2659 KB)
References
Calculators
Concentration (start) × Volume (start) = Concentration (final) × Volume (final)